top of page

Why Innovation Stalls, Even in Agile Teams

Updated: 4 days ago

Why strong signals and solid tech still stall and how to align audience, decisions, and delivery.


Split image: On the left, a man uses a phone with musical icons, a printer below; text reads "User Validation". Right shows stressed video callers; text reads "Internal meeting".
Designing without a defined audience and access for validation guarantees a cycle of unproductive internal meetings and a misaligned product.

Innovation should be exciting. Yet even the most agile teams can find it exhausting when structure, clarity, or ownership break down. Good intentions are not enough. Misalignment, slow decisions, and resistance to change can derail even the strongest ideas.


The story that follows is from my time working in a large enterprise with significant resources. Yet the same challenges, from unclear ownership to shifting priorities and audience confusion, are the ones that trip up agile teams in companies with far less margin for error. In this post, I explore why innovation stalls, despite strong market signals and solid technical capability, and share ways in which to avoid the same traps.


The Vision: A Unified Platform for Physical-Digital Interaction


The idea was simple but powerful: use a smartphone to scan printed images or labels and reveal relevant information, animation, or even augmented reality (AR) experiences. The potential applications were wide-ranging, from tracking supply chains to delivering immersive product demos.


The team had developed three distinct technologies built around computer vision and machine learning:


1) Image Recognition:

Hand holds a polaroid of trees among several photos on a rustic table, next to a green mug of coffee. Bright, nostalgic atmosphere.

Users could scan any printed image e.g., photos of cats, landmarks or products, which would trigger digital content e.g., cat videos, landmark facts, product walkthroughs, all without needing QR codes.


2) Serialized Watermarks:

Curved architectural photo with wavy lines in gold and brown tones. The top layer peels, revealing a textured surface beneath.

We created a method to include hidden patterns in our printed materials that computers could read. These patterns enabled secure tracking and the storage of additional details about items. Since our product suite was the only way to establish, print, and enable these patterns, it significantly increased the value our company could provide.


3) Augmented Reality (AR):

Hands hold tablet displaying AR shopping app with red sneakers. Options to change color and add to cart are visible. Bright, modern setting.

We developed an augmented reality platform that used image recognition to initiate interactive experiences. Users could move their camera, and digital content like 3D models, games, or videos would stay fixed to the image. For instance, a product label could launch a virtual tutorial or a branded game.



The Goal

The long-term goal was a unified platform where brands could print, track, and enhance physical materials for the benefit of consumers, all powered by an integrated toolset.


Why Innovation Stalls, Even in Agile Teams


Despite early traction and clear potential, execution hit a wall. Here's what happened:


Infographic titled "The Innovation Paradox" contrasts "Good Intentions" like "Bold Vision" with "Reality" issues like "Delays" using icons.

When you lose sight of who you’re building for

We initially focused on non-technical users to simplify migration from legacy tools. But we underestimated the needs of developers, who required consistent APIs and integration paths. This slowed progress and added unexpected costs. In hindsight, getting clear on your audience and reviewing that clarity often is a strategic essential, not merely a research task. Any mismatch here creates problems at every stage of the work.


Conflicting Priorities

Engineering resources were split between maintaining legacy systems and building new capabilities. Without protected time or staffing, the platform effort was repeatedly interrupted. Each pause made it harder to regain momentum.


Lack of Decisive Technical Ownership

Merging multiple legacy APIs across siloed systems led to endless debate. Without a clear technical decision-maker, meetings dragged, edge cases became distractions, and progress stalled in cycles of over-analysis.


Process Over Outcomes

As uncertainty grew, so did the desire to "prove" value through extensive user research. We created beautiful prototypes and personas. But without technical buy-in, these assets couldn’t move us forward. Prototypes looked great but were isolated from real-world constraints.


Without working code, even the slickest demos cannot surface integration risks or performance issues. Early stage innovation needs engineers in the room, not only designers.


Lessons Learned


Tactical takeaways: These are practical actions that I learned that will help to improve day-to-day execution and delivery.


  • Prototype with Engineers, Not Just Designers:

    Early stage innovation demands working code. Wireframes and slide decks cannot uncover integration risks or performance issues. Real prototypes can.

  • Keep Process Light:

    Smaller teams need just enough structure to move fast without chaos.

  • Plan for Legacy Drag:

    Even early startups face legacy issues, whether that is a hasty tech stack or investor promises.

  • Empower Ownership:

    Clear ownership helps startups scale decision making without adding layers of management.


Why These Lessons Matter to Startups


The project didn’t fail because the idea was bad. It stalled because of misalignment, weak execution, and unclear ownership. These challenges can arise in any organisation with ambition but without the structure needed to turn intent into action.


Whether you're building something new at a fast-growing startup or evolving a legacy product at scale, innovation budgets must account for more than features. Success depends on enabling clarity, empowering teams, and moving fast with purpose.


The Personal Side


This work stretched my UX skills, deepened my appreciation for cross-functional collaboration, and reinforced just how difficult and yet rewarding it is to drive change in a complex environment. We saw a 22% increase in qualified leads which implied that the commercial promise was real.


The project may not have launched, but the lessons shaped how I approach product leadership today.


Takeaways for Startup Founders and Product Leaders


When innovation slows down, it is rarely due to a lack of ideas. The problem is usually structural: unclear ownership, shifting priorities, or misaligned incentives. These challenges appear in teams of every size, but in startups they surface faster and cut deeper.


The principles below come from experience. They are lessons that help early teams stay aligned, move faster, and turn intent into execution.


  1. Understand Your Audience Distinguish between buyers, implementers, and end users. Success depends on aligning your solution with all three.

  2. Communicate the Vision, Repeatedly Clarity comes from repetition. Keep restating who the audience is, why the work matters, and the outcomes you aim for.

  3. Empower Ownership Decentralise authority so teams can move decisively. When the vision and audience are clear, empowered teams can act with confidence.



Whether you are shaping a new product or evolving an existing one, these lessons matter. For startups, clarity, ownership, and focus can be the difference between momentum and missed opportunity.


I help founders bring more focus and fewer wasted features to their roadmap. If you’re scaling a startup and want to keep innovation clear and consistent, let’s talk. Reach out at info@crwburgess.com.

Comments


© CRW Burgess

bottom of page